Anonymous user
Forum:CDN: Difference between revisions
re
imported>AugurNZ m (fix again) |
imported>Kudu (re) |
||
Line 5:
----
:I see that you're using CDN77's worldssl.net for this. I use [[wikipedia:WOT Services|Web Of Trust]] (WOT) as a browser add-on to crowdsource reputation opinions before I allow third-party scripts to run in my browser. WOT advises that [http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/cdn77.com cdn77.com has a poor reputation] so I have blocked it using [[wikipedia:NoScript|NoScript]]. My Orain webpages now all look screwy, as one might expect, as you have moved the static content to CDN77.com. Can you give us more information about the CDN decision? <span title="Meta-Wiki profile" class="plainlinks">[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:AugurNZ <font color="#000" face="Times">'''''Augur'''''</font><font color="#33f" family="Arial">'''''NZ'''''</font>]</span> <span title="Meta-Wiki talk" class="plainlinks">[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AugurNZ <font color="#000" size="4">✐</font>]</span>[[Special:Contributions/AugurNZ|<font size="4" color="#000">⌕</font>]] 04:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
:CDN77 was chosen for its great number of Points of Presence (PoP), its apparent reliability, and its extremely low prices (2-2.5x less than competitors). Note that CDN77 does not manipulate the content like CloudFlare does: it just serves the content you would formerly access directly from Orain's servers. I don't see any reason not to trust scripts from CDN77. [[User:Kudu|Kudu]] ([[User talk:Kudu|talk]]) 22:01, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
| |||