Anonymous user
Forum:Organizational structure: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>Kudu m (no need to add an hr every time :)) |
imported>Tyreek No edit summary |
||
Line 15:
No. ಠ_ಠ to be honest I think they should only be chosen by the founders of Orain because this can lead to anyone acting like a trusted person deeply but then stabs people in the back and abuses their powers. --[[User:Tyreek|Tyreek]] ([[User talk:Tyreek|talk]]) 01:37, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
:The example was given above, of English Wikipedia's ArbCom. I don't have much experience with Wikipedia myself, but is there evidence of such nefarious behavior as Tyreek is warning about, on ArbCom? If so, is it widespread abuse? If not widespread, how was it mitigated? Could we apply the same solutions here at Orain? Sorry, as per normal I pose more questions than I offer answers to. <span title="Meta-Wiki profile" class="plainlinks">[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:AugurNZ <font color="#000" face="Times">'''''Augur'''''</font><font color="#33f" family="Arial">'''''NZ'''''</font>]</span> <span title="Meta-Wiki talk" class="plainlinks">[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AugurNZ <font color="#000" size="4">✐</font>]</span>[[Special:Contributions/AugurNZ|<font size="4" color="#000">⌕</font>]] 16:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
::All I gotta say is bad idea because Wikipedia has a biased administration who no matter how many reports on them, they never get demoted as well as they even use sockpuppets and bots to cause edit wars.--[[User:Tyreek|Tyreek]] ([[User talk:Tyreek|talk]]) 21:59, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
| |||