Anonymous user
Forum:Organizational structure: Difference between revisions
re
imported>Kudu (re) |
imported>Joe G (re) |
||
Line 22:
----
I just noticed an issue: we're now four stewards, who would occupy four seats on the Community Council. However, the Council should usually have an odd number of members, otherwise there would be ties. I guess that, for now, we could get the (Co-)Leaders to settle ties. Anyway, it should be a consensus-based process and there shouldn't usually be 2-2 splits. [[User:Kudu|Kudu]] ([[User talk:Kudu|talk]]) 23:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
:Another option is to have the leader (if we so chose to appoint only one) not get a vote? Then you have three voting members and a leader without a vote. That's how the board I currently sit on in the offline world works. The chair only gets to vote in certain situations like a tie (if a member is absent leaving us with an even number of people). Not sure how great of an idea that is, but it is an option. -- <font color="blue"><b>[[User:Joe G|Joe G.]]</b></font> ([[User_talk:Joe G|Talk]]) 00:06, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
| |||