Forum:Automatic wiki creation: Difference between revisions
re
imported>Tyreek No edit summary |
(re) |
||
Line 7:
::I guess that might put a limit on such content. Though, just having an actively monitored wiki creation log would probably solve most issues there could be, if problematic wikis were quickly deleted. From a legal perspective, I'm sure that it's fine as long as you remove the content as soon as you find out about it. It's possible that someone might advocate illegal activity on an existing wiki regardless. The main issue I see would be test wikis of people just testing the service, but they could be quickly deleted. I think that the ability for people to just jump in an create wikis would be an attraction over other wiki hosts that allow people to create wikis automatically. We should aim to get people before they get sucked into the hollow promises of Wikia. They claim to offer so much, but it's really nothing and people will end up regretting their decision to go to Wikia. [[User:Inquisitor Sasha|Inquisitor Sasha]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor Sasha|talk]]) 01:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
:::I must say I am in agreement with Sasha.--[[User:Tyreek|Tyreek]] ([[User talk:Tyreek|talk]]) 14:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
:It's nothing against the idea but rather the technical behind it. Sure, automatic creation reduces work on the responsible group (for now, Stewards) but seriously does apply more pressure to sysadmins in case of a wiki needing to be deleted which is a practise only done once by me. In addition the cases of wikis being created causing legal issues, Orain at the moment really can not afford this as we have four staff members - One is inactive, two are purely technical and one deals with technical stuff and identification (thus point of contact for legal requests). I'll let [[User:Kudu|Kudu]] comment but that is my view. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 14:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
| |||