Forum:CDN: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>AugurNZ m (fix) |
imported>AugurNZ m (fix again) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
We're now using a CDN for static resources. Requests will be up to twice as fast. [[User:Kudu|Kudu]] ([[User talk:Kudu|talk]]) 21:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)}} |
We're now using a CDN for static resources. Requests will be up to twice as fast. [[User:Kudu|Kudu]] ([[User talk:Kudu|talk]]) 21:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
:I see that you're using CDN77's worldssl.net for this. I use [[wikipedia:WOT Services|Web Of Trust]] (WOT) as a browser add-on to crowdsource reputation opinions before I allow third-party scripts to run in my browser. WOT advises that [http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/cdn77.com cdn77.com has a poor reputation] so I have blocked it using [[wikipedia:NoScript|NoScript]]. My Orain webpages now all look screwy, as one might expect, as you have moved the static content to CDN77. |
:I see that you're using CDN77's worldssl.net for this. I use [[wikipedia:WOT Services|Web Of Trust]] (WOT) as a browser add-on to crowdsource reputation opinions before I allow third-party scripts to run in my browser. WOT advises that [http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/cdn77.com cdn77.com has a poor reputation] so I have blocked it using [[wikipedia:NoScript|NoScript]]. My Orain webpages now all look screwy, as one might expect, as you have moved the static content to CDN77.com. Can you give us more information about the CDN decision? <span title="Meta-Wiki profile" class="plainlinks">[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:AugurNZ <font color="#000" face="Times">'''''Augur'''''</font><font color="#33f" family="Arial">'''''NZ'''''</font>]</span> <span title="Meta-Wiki talk" class="plainlinks">[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AugurNZ <font color="#000" size="4">✐</font>]</span>[[Special:Contributions/AugurNZ|<font size="4" color="#000">⌕</font>]] 04:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 04:36, 21 October 2013
Forums: Index → General discussion
We're now using a CDN for static resources. Requests will be up to twice as fast. Kudu (talk) 21:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- I see that you're using CDN77's worldssl.net for this. I use Web Of Trust (WOT) as a browser add-on to crowdsource reputation opinions before I allow third-party scripts to run in my browser. WOT advises that cdn77.com has a poor reputation so I have blocked it using NoScript. My Orain webpages now all look screwy, as one might expect, as you have moved the static content to CDN77.com. Can you give us more information about the CDN decision? AugurNZ ✐⌕ 04:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)