Stewards/Confirmation: Difference between revisions
→Kudu: re
(→Kudu: re) |
(→Kudu: re) |
||
Line 44:
:::Dusti and I discussed this and he decided when he gets back; he will change to the statement I used. This is an election type thing. There is no consesus here to promote as is the point of a reconfirmation here. I don't get the fuss; Kudu does not use the rights actively at all (3 steward actions this year) thus removing him is not going to invoke hell. It just carries out the consensus. Dusti's original close was discretion based; of which he has a major COI as we all do. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 01:15, 4 September 2014 (BST)
::::Also I feel I made this case clear that it will be an election as all future users will go through and stewards will decide if there is consensus for supporting the candidate. As such; there is no consensus supporting thus as would happen in an election and VoC, removal follows. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 01:17, 4 September 2014 (BST)
:::::Notwithstanding my original feelings and my statement made when closed, as this became a steward discussion, John did not voice his opinion during the time of the Confirmation. He is now making his stance and his feelings known, and like the rest of the community, he is entitled to a !vote. As such, with his opinion being weighed among the rest of the community, there is now a consensus that Kudu's confirmation was '''unsuccessful''' and as such his steward flag has been removed. <font face="MV Boli">[[User:Dusti|'''<font color="#ff0000">D</font><font color="#ff6600">u</font><font color="#009900">s</font><font color="#0000ff">t</font><font color="#6600cc">i</font>''']][[User talk:Dusti|<sup>*Let's talk!*</sup>]]</font> 01:22, 4 September 2014 (BST)
== Joe G ==
| |||