Stewards/Confirmation: Difference between revisions

(→‎Kudu: re)
imported>Kudu
(→‎Kudu: cmt)
Line 45:
::::Also I feel I made this case clear that it will be an election as all future users will go through and stewards will decide if there is consensus for supporting the candidate. As such; there is no consensus supporting thus as would happen in an election and VoC, removal follows. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 01:17, 4 September 2014 (BST)
:::::Notwithstanding my original feelings and my statement made when closed, as this became a steward discussion, John did not voice his opinion during the time of the Confirmation. He is now making his stance and his feelings known, and like the rest of the community, he is entitled to a !vote. As such, with his opinion being weighed among the rest of the community, there is now a consensus that Kudu's confirmation was '''unsuccessful''' and as such his steward flag has been removed. <font face="MV Boli">[[User:Dusti|'''<font color="#ff0000">D</font><font color="#ff6600">u</font><font color="#009900">s</font><font color="#0000ff">t</font><font color="#6600cc">i</font>''']][[User talk:Dusti|<sup>*Let's talk!*</sup>]]</font> 01:22, 4 September 2014 (BST)
::::::I'll accept the result of this discussion, but I take issue with the rationale behind the conclusion. As Dusti pointed out, John did not voice his opinion during the time of the confirmation in the form of a clear support or oppose, and he still hasn't. He merely theorized as to the result that should be implied by a finding of lack of consensus. That may or may not be correct, but if it's taken as such, it should be identified clearly as the reason for stripping me of my steward flag, and not some !vote that was never clearly stated. <span style="font-family: Georgia, Garamond, serif;">[[User:Kudu|<span style="color: blue;">Kudu</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Kudu|<sup><span style="color: blue;">~I/O~</span></sup>]]</span> 02:46, 4 September 2014 (BST)
 
== Joe G ==
Anonymous user