Stewards/Confirmation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
(→Kudu: + note) |
imported>Joe G (→Kudu: re John) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
{{Discussion bottom}} |
{{Discussion bottom}} |
||
:Public note: I am discussing this with Dusti. Consensus for is granting; No consensus and against consensus means revoking. Dusti's decision here is one I disagree with as looking at how supports and oppose are placed; I do not believe there is consensus to keep Kudu as a steward. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 22:25, 3 September 2014 (BST) |
:Public note: I am discussing this with Dusti. Consensus for is granting; No consensus and against consensus means revoking. Dusti's decision here is one I disagree with as looking at how supports and oppose are placed; I do not believe there is consensus to keep Kudu as a steward. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 22:25, 3 September 2014 (BST) |
||
::For the record, I disagree with John and am in agreement with Dusti's decision to allow Kudu to retain his steward flags. It is not clearly stated what shall happen in the case of no consensus and the wording of the confirmation description offers no assistance or guidance to whether a candidate need to attain an affirmative vote for keeping the flags or just not get a majority negative one. In the case we have here, I agree it is the correct decision to allow Kudu to keep his flags given he has provided an explanation for his activity levels and there are no other reasons brought to suggest the need to remove his steward flags at this time. -- <font color="blue"><b>[[User:Joe G|Joe G.]]</b></font> ([[User_talk:Joe G|Talk]]) 01:10, 4 September 2014 (BST) |
|||
== Joe G == |
== Joe G == |
||