Forum:Changes to Orain's deploy cycle - We want your opinion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
Southparkfan (talk | contribs) (+question) |
(archive stuff) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|General discussion}} |
{{Forumheader|General discussion}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
{{discussion top|Please see [[Forum:New Deploy Cycle]] [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 16:17, 17 August 2014 (BST)}} |
|||
Hello everyone. |
Hello everyone. |
||
Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
* {{support}} Mostly due to the easy rollback capabilities and the availability of some bleeding edge Beta Features that otherwise work poorly or not at all on the current stable releases. [[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 14:51, 5 August 2014 (BST) |
* {{support}} Mostly due to the easy rollback capabilities and the availability of some bleeding edge Beta Features that otherwise work poorly or not at all on the current stable releases. [[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 14:51, 5 August 2014 (BST) |
||
* What about security fixes? As this is a weekly release, does that mean we are faster equipped with all security fixes than when we would use the stable release? [[User:Southparkfan|Southparkfan]] ([[User talk:Southparkfan|talk]]) 12:20, 10 August 2014 (BST) |
* What about security fixes? As this is a weekly release, does that mean we are faster equipped with all security fixes than when we would use the stable release? [[User:Southparkfan|Southparkfan]] ([[User talk:Southparkfan|talk]]) 12:20, 10 August 2014 (BST) |
||
*:Yes. Any backports and hot fixes will also be deployed either weekly or as they are patched as necessary. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 12:54, 10 August 2014 (BST) |
|||
* I prefer this one. — [[User talk:Revi|<span style="color:green">Revi<sub><small>Complaint?</small></sub></span>]] 14:23, 10 August 2014 (BST) |
|||
{{oppose}} The latest wmf builds have been laden with features to remove administrative power and site autonomy, rushed, and buggy. Case in point: superprotect. Cannot oppose strongly enough. [[User:Vorticity|Vorticity]] ([[User talk:Vorticity|talk]]) 00:55, 11 August 2014 (BST) |
|||
:Actually this is a Wikimedia-only thing. This is irrelevant. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 02:25, 11 August 2014 (BST) |
|||
:Superprotect - the most abusive thing in 2014 by WMF -is only for Wikimedia project. — [[User talk:Revi|<span style="color:green">Revi<sub><small>Complaint?</small></sub></span>]] 14:01, 11 August 2014 (BST) |
|||
{{support}} – If it's used by WMF, it's probably secure enough. As long as this isn't going be any less secure for WMF sites. [[User:Lieutenant S. Reznov|Lieutenant S., Geschichtsmeister des Lexipedium]] ([[User talk:Lieutenant S. Reznov|talk]]) 14:39, 11 August 2014 (BST) |
|||
=== Proposal 2: Use stable builds === |
=== Proposal 2: Use stable builds === |
||
Line 23: | Line 31: | ||
; Comments/Votes |
; Comments/Votes |
||
=== Other proposals === |
=== Other proposals === |
||
*Ability to embed YouTube videos, a capability recently provided by Shoutwiki. |
|||
Feel free to suggest other ideas here. |
|||
{{discussion bottom}} |
Latest revision as of 15:17, 17 August 2014
Forums: Index → General discussion