Anonymous user
Talk:Stewards: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Confirmation: re and close
imported>Joe G (→Confirmation: re and close) |
|||
Line 13:
:::Considering that this is a brand new account, and this is the accounts second edit eight minutes after registering, I'm slightly confused and bothered as it, on the surface, seems to be a sock account. <font face="MV Boli">[[User:Dusti|'''<font color="#ff0000">D</font><font color="#ff6600">u</font><font color="#009900">s</font><font color="#0000ff">t</font><font color="#6600cc">i</font>''']][[User talk:Dusti|<sup>*Let's talk!*</sup>]]</font> 05:40, 19 July 2015 (BST)
:I second the request mostly because it seems some people are using the rights. Since this is a "community-driven" network, I see no reason to deny a request to re-evaluate. Also I can't reset my password or create a new account because the captcha boxes don't appear. [[Special:Contributions/50.7.138.125|50.7.138.125]] 01:45, 22 July 2015 (BST)
::I'm sorry, but this discussion is '''closed''' and is not open for further discussion. As I stated above, there is not a legitimate reason presented for their re-evaluation and Kudu and Dusti are the project leaders and do work behind the scenes. I'm not trying to take away the "community driven"-ness of anything, but there does have to be a bit of staff discretion on this matter. If you can provide a legitimate reason, beyond inactivity, I invite you to do so in a new section. At that time, if the un-involved staff feel that re-evaluation is necessary, then protocol will be established and enacted. Thank you for your understanding, -- <font color="blue"><b>[[User:Joe G|Joe G.]]</b></font> ([[User_talk:Joe G|Talk]]) 02:56, 22 July 2015 (BST)
| |||