Steward requests/Global permissions: Difference between revisions
imported>Technical 13 (yes and no) |
|||
Line 58:
*{{Oppose}} Per my comments on the GR request. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 20:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''': This is overkill without some substantial activity to support it. [[User:Technical 13|Technical 13]] ([[User talk:Technical 13|talk]]) 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
* {{oppose}} not until you have some global rollback work under your belt :) <font face="MV Boli">[[User:Dusti|'''<font color="#ff0000">D</font><font color="#ff6600">u</font><font color="#009900">s</font><font color="#0000ff">t</font><font color="#6600cc">i</font>''']][[User talk:Dusti|<sup>*Let's talk!*</sup>]]</font> 21:47, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 21:47, 15 August 2013
Steward Permission requests | ||
What is this page used for?
|
Requests for global rollbacker permissions
Instructions for making a request
|
---|
Before requesting, make sure that:
Requests will be approved if consensus leads in the addition of the global right. Requests will close no earlier than three days. No exceptions will be allowed. This is not a vote and inputs is appreciated. |
Southparkfan@global
- Global user: Southparkfan (CA • global groups)
I want to be a global rollbacker because I want to fight vandalism on other(, inactive) wiki's. I will try to answer questions. :) Kind regards, Southparkfan (talk) 17:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Global edit count is 44 - user's global account is complete. Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
OpposeObvious reasons for opposing but I guess since I said this would never be a voting area, I'll explain. The only pretty much on has edits at TestWiki. Therefore failing #1 'You have sufficient cross-wiki activity to allow the community to analyse them;'. I believe this could be a speedy close but for the sake of being fair, I'll let others comment. John (talk) 20:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)- Support though his edits may be constricted to one area, I don't see any problematic behavior. I wouldn't expect him to be highly active on every wiki - as they're each a niche and thus not everyone is going to have something to add. Dusti*Let's talk!* 20:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support: this is appropriate for anti-vandalism. Technical 13 (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Requests for global sysop permissions
Instructions for making a request
|
---|
Before requesting, make sure that:
Requests will be approved if consensus leads in the addition of the global right. Requests will close no earlier than five days. No exceptions will be allowed. This is not a vote and inputs is appreciated. |
Southparkfan@global
- Global user: Southparkfan (CA • global groups)
I want to be a global sysop because I want to fight vandalism on other(, inactive) wiki's. There a just two global sysops and for 10 wiki's I think more sysops are better. I'm also a sysop & bureaucrat on TestWiki. I will try to answer questions. :) Kind regards, Southparkfan (talk) 17:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Global edits are 44 - user's global account is complete. Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per my comments on the GR request. John (talk) 20:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose: This is overkill without some substantial activity to support it. Technical 13 (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose not until you have some global rollback work under your belt :) Dusti*Let's talk!* 21:47, 15 August 2013 (UTC)