User talk:Arcane: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>Mikemikev |
imported>Avigilante |
||
| Line 318: | Line 318: | ||
:I have reviewed the content you have pointed out, and so far I see nothing that breaches our ToU. Mere discussion and speculation about someone's identity in a civil manner with links to sources for which such speculation is derived as well as opinions based on cited sources are not in and of themselves a violation of policy, and I have seen nothing that is anything other than mere ideological differences of opinion. I'm sorry you are offended by their ideological views, but they are entitled to their opinions as much as you are entitled to yours. I have no stake in this either way aside from wanting to maintain the policies of this site, and so unless they are making "doxing plans" or otherwise spreading deliberate assaults on someone's reputation, I see no policy breaches. If you are trying to protect the reputation of Kimmo Alm, I understand that, but it would be up to him to make complaints of libel, which we would of course duly look into and deal with if that is true, which at this point what you directed me to does not qualify. [[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 00:44, 9 May 2015 (BST) |
:I have reviewed the content you have pointed out, and so far I see nothing that breaches our ToU. Mere discussion and speculation about someone's identity in a civil manner with links to sources for which such speculation is derived as well as opinions based on cited sources are not in and of themselves a violation of policy, and I have seen nothing that is anything other than mere ideological differences of opinion. I'm sorry you are offended by their ideological views, but they are entitled to their opinions as much as you are entitled to yours. I have no stake in this either way aside from wanting to maintain the policies of this site, and so unless they are making "doxing plans" or otherwise spreading deliberate assaults on someone's reputation, I see no policy breaches. If you are trying to protect the reputation of Kimmo Alm, I understand that, but it would be up to him to make complaints of libel, which we would of course duly look into and deal with if that is true, which at this point what you directed me to does not qualify. [[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 00:44, 9 May 2015 (BST) |
||
::This is probably Atlantid. [[User:Mikemikev|Mikemikev]] ([[User talk:Mikemikev|talk]]) 06:22, 9 May 2015 (BST) |
::This is probably Atlantid. [[User:Mikemikev|Mikemikev]] ([[User talk:Mikemikev|talk]]) 06:22, 9 May 2015 (BST) |
||
: " Mere discussion and speculation about someone's identity in a civil manner with links to sources for which such speculation is derived as well as opinions based on cited sources are not in and of themselves a violation of policy", you're telling me I can set up a Wiki with Orain and just post junk about people? I thought these were encyclopedias for informative content? If you look at Rightpedia, there are barely any edits there (excluding the anti-Semitism) other than its 3 editors obsessing about "Kimmo Alm" or "Atlantid". [[User:Avigilante|Avigilante]] ([[User talk:Avigilante|talk]]) 19:14, 10 May 2015 (BST) |
|||