Steward requests/Global permissions
Steward Permission requests | ||
What is this page used for?
|
Requests for global rollbacker permissions
Instructions for making a request
|
---|
Before requesting, make sure that:
Requests will be approved if consensus leads in the addition of the global right. Requests will close no earlier than three days. No exceptions will be allowed. This is not a vote and inputs is appreciated. |
Southparkfan@global
- Global user: Southparkfan (CA • global groups)
I want to be a global rollbacker because I want to fight vandalism on other(, inactive) wiki's. I will try to answer questions. :) Kind regards, Southparkfan (talk) 17:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Global edit count is 44 - user's global account is complete. Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
OpposeObvious reasons for opposing but I guess since I said this would never be a voting area, I'll explain. The only pretty much on has edits at TestWiki. Therefore failing #1 'You have sufficient cross-wiki activity to allow the community to analyse them;'. I believe this could be a speedy close but for the sake of being fair, I'll let others comment. John (talk) 20:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)- Support though his edits may be constricted to one area, I don't see any problematic behavior. I wouldn't expect him to be highly active on every wiki - as they're each a niche and thus not everyone is going to have something to add. Dusti*Let's talk!* 20:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support: this is appropriate for anti-vandalism. Technical 13 (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support for CVN measures. TCN7JM 13:43, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support Addshore (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Done While I did say this should be open for three days, we have a case where majority support exists (discounting my vote, above 100%). A majority of the community as well as stewards have put in their input, while not a vote there does not seem to be any major problem. If anyone wishes to oppose this, best to re-file stating a removal or bring it up at Stewards' noticeboard. John (talk) 15:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Requests for global sysop permissions
Instructions for making a request
|
---|
Before requesting, make sure that:
Requests will be approved if consensus leads in the addition of the global right. Requests will close no earlier than five days. No exceptions will be allowed. This is not a vote and inputs is appreciated. |
Southparkfan@global
- Global user: Southparkfan (CA • global groups)
I want to be a global sysop because I want to fight vandalism on other(, inactive) wiki's. There a just two global sysops and for 10 wiki's I think more sysops are better. I'm also a sysop & bureaucrat on TestWiki. I will try to answer questions. :) Kind regards, Southparkfan (talk) 17:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Global edits are 44 - user's global account is complete. Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per my comments on the GR request. John (talk) 20:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose: This is overkill without some substantial activity to support it. Technical 13 (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose not until you have some global rollback work under your belt :) Dusti*Let's talk!* 21:47, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Can I withdrawn only this request? Southparkfan (talk) 22:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn. John (talk) 22:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)