Steward requests/Global permissions/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
imported>JianhuiBot m archiving 1 approved request from Steward requests/Global permissions |
imported>JianhuiBot m →Requests for global sysop permissions: archiving 1 approved request from Steward requests/Global permissions#Requests for global sysop permissions |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
* Can I withdrawn <u>only</u> this request? [[User:Southparkfan|Southparkfan]] ([[User talk:Southparkfan|talk]]) 22:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
* Can I withdrawn <u>only</u> this request? [[User:Southparkfan|Southparkfan]] ([[User talk:Southparkfan|talk]]) 22:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
* Withdrawn. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 22:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
* Withdrawn. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 22:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
=== Shanmugamp7@global === |
|||
{{sr-request |
|||
|status = done |
|||
|domain = global |
|||
|user name = Shanmugamp7 |
|||
}} |
|||
Since I like things to be done by consensus (most of the time, when necessary of course), I am making probably the first consensus based 'Steward recommendation' which is Shanmugamp7. Those who actually look at Meta RC will see I have now promoted Shan to admin on two wikis for sysops related tasks which are not controversial (the allthetropeswiki one went through local admins, I removed it once they finished). Since I feel they will make great use of the tools, benefiting Orain and we act on consensus, I am asking the community to trust them with the right. For information; they are most active on Wikimedia where they hold sysop on two projects as well as global rollback and global sysop permissions. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 16:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:: I accept. I will use the rights only to do non-controversial things if granted [[User:Shanmugamp7|Shanmugamp7]] ([[User talk:Shanmugamp7|talk]]) 16:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Seems okay to promote. I trust John's judgement. Regards, — [[User:David|<span style="color:royalblue; font-family: Segoe Script">David</span>]] 17:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}} [[User:Jianhui67|'''<font color="red">Jianhui67</font>''']]<sup> [[User talk:Jianhui67|<span style="color:#0E0">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 02:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}}[[User:Revi|<span style="color:green">레비<small>Revi</small></span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Revi|<span style="color:Green">D</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Revi|<span style="color:blue">C</span>]][[Special:EmailUser/Revi|<span style="color:pink">M</span>]]</sub> 14:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}} I agree with the nomination. User can clearly be trusted.—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] [[User talk:C678|<sup style="color:red;font-family:arnprior">Chat]]<sub style="margin-left:-4.4ex;color:red;font-family:arnprior">Offline</sub> 22:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
*{{done}} User rights granted globally. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 17:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Removal of Access == |
== Removal of Access == |
Revision as of 08:25, 8 February 2014
Requests for global rollbacker permissions
Southparkfan@global
- Global user: Southparkfan (CA • global groups)
I want to be a global rollbacker because I want to fight vandalism on other(, inactive) wiki's. I will try to answer questions. :) Kind regards, Southparkfan (talk) 17:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Global edit count is 44 - user's global account is complete. Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
OpposeObvious reasons for opposing but I guess since I said this would never be a voting area, I'll explain. The only pretty much on has edits at TestWiki. Therefore failing #1 'You have sufficient cross-wiki activity to allow the community to analyse them;'. I believe this could be a speedy close but for the sake of being fair, I'll let others comment. John (talk) 20:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)- Support though his edits may be constricted to one area, I don't see any problematic behavior. I wouldn't expect him to be highly active on every wiki - as they're each a niche and thus not everyone is going to have something to add. Dusti*Let's talk!* 20:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support: this is appropriate for anti-vandalism. Technical 13 (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support for CVN measures. TCN7JM 13:43, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support Addshore (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Done While I did say this should be open for three days, we have a case where majority support exists (discounting my vote, above 100%). A majority of the community as well as stewards have put in their input, while not a vote there does not seem to be any major problem. If anyone wishes to oppose this, best to re-file stating a removal or bring it up at Stewards' noticeboard. John (talk) 15:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Yena@global
- Global user: Yena (CA • global groups)
I have been fighting against vandal in some WMF wikis and I think I can fight against vandals with these experiments. Thank you. by 레비ReviDiscussWMF wikis at 17:11, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support I guess. Seems like a well intentioned, trustable young editor. Technical 13 (talk) 18:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support --DangSunM (talk) 22:57, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support I trust this user. TCN7JM 23:24, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- Done John (talk) 23:32, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Jianhui67@global
- Global user: Jianhui67 (CA • global groups)
Hi there stewards! I would want to be a global rollbacker so as to fight vandalism on Orain Wikis. I have been fighting vandalism in WMF and Wikia wikis. I believe I would do well with global rollback here. I know I only have 44 global edits. I'll try to become active here. Thanks! Jianhui67 (talk) 05:40, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- I trust him. He seems like he knows what he's doing, and he clearly knows how to revert vandalism. TCN7JM 04:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Well, here almost has no vandal, but if I have another mates can help reverting, that's not bad. --레비ReviDCM 07:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support I support this request, and if no objections are raised, will close it today. -- Joe G. (Talk) 16:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Done Consensus shown above. Be careful with the new tools globally. John (talk) 20:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Requests for global sysop permissions
Southparkfan@global
- Global user: Southparkfan (CA • global groups)
I want to be a global sysop because I want to fight vandalism on other(, inactive) wiki's. There a just two global sysops and for 10 wiki's I think more sysops are better. I'm also a sysop & bureaucrat on TestWiki. I will try to answer questions. :) Kind regards, Southparkfan (talk) 17:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Note: Global edits are 44 - user's global account is complete. Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per my comments on the GR request. John (talk) 20:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose: This is overkill without some substantial activity to support it. Technical 13 (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose not until you have some global rollback work under your belt :) Dusti*Let's talk!* 21:47, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Can I withdrawn only this request? Southparkfan (talk) 22:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn. John (talk) 22:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Shanmugamp7@global
- Global user: Shanmugamp7 (CA • global groups)
Since I like things to be done by consensus (most of the time, when necessary of course), I am making probably the first consensus based 'Steward recommendation' which is Shanmugamp7. Those who actually look at Meta RC will see I have now promoted Shan to admin on two wikis for sysops related tasks which are not controversial (the allthetropeswiki one went through local admins, I removed it once they finished). Since I feel they will make great use of the tools, benefiting Orain and we act on consensus, I am asking the community to trust them with the right. For information; they are most active on Wikimedia where they hold sysop on two projects as well as global rollback and global sysop permissions. John (talk) 16:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- I accept. I will use the rights only to do non-controversial things if granted Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Seems okay to promote. I trust John's judgement. Regards, — David 17:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Jianhui67 talk 02:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support레비ReviDCM 14:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support I agree with the nomination. User can clearly be trusted.—cyberpower ChatOffline 22:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Done User rights granted globally. John (talk) 17:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)