Steward requests/Global permissions/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Orain Meta
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>JianhuiBot
m (archiving 1 approved request from Steward requests/Global permissions)
imported>JianhuiBot
Line 56: Line 56:
* Can I withdrawn <u>only</u> this request? [[User:Southparkfan|Southparkfan]] ([[User talk:Southparkfan|talk]]) 22:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
* Can I withdrawn <u>only</u> this request? [[User:Southparkfan|Southparkfan]] ([[User talk:Southparkfan|talk]]) 22:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
* Withdrawn. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 22:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
* Withdrawn. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 22:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

=== Shanmugamp7@global ===
{{sr-request
|status = done
|domain = global
|user name = Shanmugamp7
}}
Since I like things to be done by consensus (most of the time, when necessary of course), I am making probably the first consensus based 'Steward recommendation' which is Shanmugamp7. Those who actually look at Meta RC will see I have now promoted Shan to admin on two wikis for sysops related tasks which are not controversial (the allthetropeswiki one went through local admins, I removed it once they finished). Since I feel they will make great use of the tools, benefiting Orain and we act on consensus, I am asking the community to trust them with the right. For information; they are most active on Wikimedia where they hold sysop on two projects as well as global rollback and global sysop permissions. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 16:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
:: I accept. I will use the rights only to do non-controversial things if granted [[User:Shanmugamp7|Shanmugamp7]] ([[User talk:Shanmugamp7|talk]]) 16:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support''' Seems okay to promote. I trust John's judgement. Regards, — [[User:David|<span style="color:royalblue; font-family: Segoe Script">David</span>]] 17:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
*{{support}} [[User:Jianhui67|'''<font color="red">Jianhui67</font>''']]<sup> [[User talk:Jianhui67|<span style="color:#0E0">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup> 02:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
*{{support}}[[User:Revi|<span style="color:green">레비<small>Revi</small></span>]]<sub>[[User talk:Revi|<span style="color:Green">D</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Revi|<span style="color:blue">C</span>]][[Special:EmailUser/Revi|<span style="color:pink">M</span>]]</sub> 14:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
*{{support}} I agree with the nomination. User can clearly be trusted.—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] [[User talk:C678|<sup style="color:red;font-family:arnprior">Chat]]<sub style="margin-left:-4.4ex;color:red;font-family:arnprior">Offline</sub> 22:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
*{{done}} User rights granted globally. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 17:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


== Removal of Access ==
== Removal of Access ==

Revision as of 08:25, 8 February 2014

Archive This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Requests for global rollbacker permissions

Southparkfan@global

I want to be a global rollbacker because I want to fight vandalism on other(, inactive) wiki's. I will try to answer questions. :) Kind regards, Southparkfan (talk) 17:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

  • Note: Global edit count is 44 - user's global account is complete. Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose Obvious reasons for opposing but I guess since I said this would never be a voting area, I'll explain. The only pretty much on has edits at TestWiki. Therefore failing #1 'You have sufficient cross-wiki activity to allow the community to analyse them;'. I believe this could be a speedy close but for the sake of being fair, I'll let others comment. John (talk) 20:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
    • Support I guess. John (talk) 21:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Support though his edits may be constricted to one area, I don't see any problematic behavior. I wouldn't expect him to be highly active on every wiki - as they're each a niche and thus not everyone is going to have something to add. Dusti*Let's talk!* 20:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Support: this is appropriate for anti-vandalism. Technical 13 (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Support for CVN measures. TCN7JM 13:43, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Support Addshore (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Done While I did say this should be open for three days, we have a case where majority support exists (discounting my vote, above 100%). A majority of the community as well as stewards have put in their input, while not a vote there does not seem to be any major problem. If anyone wishes to oppose this, best to re-file stating a removal or bring it up at Stewards' noticeboard. John (talk) 15:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Yena@global

I have been fighting against vandal in some WMF wikis and I think I can fight against vandals with these experiments. Thank you. by 레비ReviDiscussWMF wikis at 17:11, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Support trusted by me. Addshore (talk) 17:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Support I guess. Seems like a well intentioned, trustable young editor. Technical 13 (talk) 18:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Support --DangSunM (talk) 22:57, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Support I trust this user. TCN7JM 23:24, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Done John (talk) 23:32, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Jianhui67@global

Hi there stewards! I would want to be a global rollbacker so as to fight vandalism on Orain Wikis. I have been fighting vandalism in WMF and Wikia wikis. I believe I would do well with global rollback here. I know I only have 44 global edits. I'll try to become active here. Thanks! Jianhui67 (talk) 05:40, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

I trust him. He seems like he knows what he's doing, and he clearly knows how to revert vandalism. TCN7JM 04:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Well, here almost has no vandal, but if I have another mates can help reverting, that's not bad. --레비ReviDCM 07:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Support I support this request, and if no objections are raised, will close it today. -- Joe G. (Talk) 16:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done Consensus shown above. Be careful with the new tools globally. John (talk) 20:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Requests for global sysop permissions

Southparkfan@global

I want to be a global sysop because I want to fight vandalism on other(, inactive) wiki's. There a just two global sysops and for 10 wiki's I think more sysops are better. I'm also a sysop & bureaucrat on TestWiki. I will try to answer questions. :) Kind regards, Southparkfan (talk) 17:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

  • Note: Global edits are 44 - user's global account is complete. Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose Per my comments on the GR request. John (talk) 20:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose: This is overkill without some substantial activity to support it. Technical 13 (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose not until you have some global rollback work under your belt :) Dusti*Let's talk!* 21:47, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Can I withdrawn only this request? Southparkfan (talk) 22:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn. John (talk) 22:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Shanmugamp7@global

Since I like things to be done by consensus (most of the time, when necessary of course), I am making probably the first consensus based 'Steward recommendation' which is Shanmugamp7. Those who actually look at Meta RC will see I have now promoted Shan to admin on two wikis for sysops related tasks which are not controversial (the allthetropeswiki one went through local admins, I removed it once they finished). Since I feel they will make great use of the tools, benefiting Orain and we act on consensus, I am asking the community to trust them with the right. For information; they are most active on Wikimedia where they hold sysop on two projects as well as global rollback and global sysop permissions. John (talk) 16:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

I accept. I will use the rights only to do non-controversial things if granted Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Seems okay to promote. I trust John's judgement. Regards, — David 17:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Jianhui67 talk 02:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Support레비ReviDCM 14:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Support I agree with the nomination. User can clearly be trusted.—cyberpower ChatOffline 22:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done User rights granted globally. John (talk) 17:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Removal of Access