Orain Meta:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Technical 13: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>Kudu (→Voting: s) |
m (→Technical 13: closing User:C678's <span> tags) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Technical 13 === |
=== Technical 13 === |
||
{{Discussion top}} |
|||
''Ending 1 February 2015 04:33 UTC'' |
''Ending 1 February 2015 04:33 UTC'' |
||
Requesting local sysop access strictly to maintain gadgets, scripts, interface messages and other similar technical aspects. I have no interest in nor will be using the bit for 'other administrative duties' until I'm well established locally, and even then such uses would be rare. — <code class="nowrap">{{U|[[User:Technical 13|Technical 13]]}} <sup>([[Special:EmailUser/Technical 13|e]] • [[User talk:Technical 13|t]] • [[Special:Contribs/Technical 13|c]])</sup></code> 04:33, 27 January 2015 (GMT) |
Requesting local sysop access strictly to maintain gadgets, scripts, interface messages and other similar technical aspects. I have no interest in nor will be using the bit for 'other administrative duties' until I'm well established locally, and even then such uses would be rare. — <code class="nowrap">{{U|[[User:Technical 13|Technical 13]]}} <sup>([[Special:EmailUser/Technical 13|e]] • [[User talk:Technical 13|t]] • [[Special:Contribs/Technical 13|c]])</sup></code> 04:33, 27 January 2015 (GMT) |
||
:As this isn't a full request, in the sense that [[User:Technical 13|Technical 13]] won't be gaining the sysop bit to act as a sysop and will be doing maintenance tasks and will not be acting as a sysop, I see no reason to not go ahead and grant this request as there haven't been any concerns shown. Should Technical wish to expand the use of his permissions and use the bit for blocking and such, another request should be filed or a notice made on the appropriate noticeboard for community discussion and/or approval. <font face="MV Boli">[[User:Dusti|'''<font color="#ff0000">D</font><font color="#ff6600">u</font><font color="#009900">s</font><font color="#0000ff">t</font><font color="#6600cc">i</font>''']][[User talk:Dusti|<sup>*Let's talk!*</sup>]]</font> 15:47, 28 January 2015 (GMT) |
|||
==== Voting ==== |
==== Voting ==== |
||
:{{Support}}. Has a legitimate and easily demonstrable need for the bit. <span style="font-family: Georgia, Garamond, serif;">[[User:Kudu|<span style="color: blue;">Kudu</span>]] [[User talk:Kudu|<sup><span style="color: blue;">~I/O~</span></sup>]]</span> 04:48, 27 January 2015 (GMT) |
:{{Support}}. Has a legitimate and easily demonstrable need for the bit. <span style="font-family: Georgia, Garamond, serif;">[[User:Kudu|<span style="color: blue;">Kudu</span>]] [[User talk:Kudu|<sup><span style="color: blue;">~I/O~</span></sup>]]</span> 04:48, 27 January 2015 (GMT) |
||
:{{Support}} I concur with Kudu. [[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 17:50, 27 January 2015 (GMT) |
|||
:{{Support}} Because my personal experience doesn't make me see otherwise.—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower</span>]] [[User talk:C678|<sup style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Chat</sup>]]<sub style="margin-left:-4.4ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 21:33, 27 January 2015 (GMT) |
|||
{{Discussion bottom}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:39, 25 May 2015
Technical 13
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Ending 1 February 2015 04:33 UTC
Requesting local sysop access strictly to maintain gadgets, scripts, interface messages and other similar technical aspects. I have no interest in nor will be using the bit for 'other administrative duties' until I'm well established locally, and even then such uses would be rare. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 04:33, 27 January 2015 (GMT)
- As this isn't a full request, in the sense that Technical 13 won't be gaining the sysop bit to act as a sysop and will be doing maintenance tasks and will not be acting as a sysop, I see no reason to not go ahead and grant this request as there haven't been any concerns shown. Should Technical wish to expand the use of his permissions and use the bit for blocking and such, another request should be filed or a notice made on the appropriate noticeboard for community discussion and/or approval. Dusti*Let's talk!* 15:47, 28 January 2015 (GMT)
Voting
Support. Has a legitimate and easily demonstrable need for the bit. Kudu ~I/O~ 04:48, 27 January 2015 (GMT)- Support I concur with Kudu. Arcane (talk) 17:50, 27 January 2015 (GMT)
- Support Because my personal experience doesn't make me see otherwise.—cyberpower ChatOnline 21:33, 27 January 2015 (GMT)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section